Discussion
The study showned that the semitendinosus tendon harvesting in new technique could bring the graft successfully all cases for ACL reconstruction without graft morbidity as premature harvesting that compared to another literatures about 7-15 %1-3. Although10 out of 32 cases (31.25%) had numbness at medial aspect of shin that was common complication in semitendinosus graft harvesting. Numbness after graft harvesting especially in minimally invasive technique had incidence 20 -40 %3,8 from saphenous nerve injury. This study show that arthroscopic assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, transtibial technique and semitendinosus graft can harvest in the same incision. The landmark 1 finger breadth below the tibial tuberosity and ¼ the width of the medial metaphysic at this level lateral to the medial tibial crest is useful to identified semitendinosus tendon and tunneling for ACL reconstruction. Therefore many of surgeon still use different technique for harvesting graft and tunneling.6,7
Limitations of this technique may cause saphenous nerve injuries because the incision quite small. But the exposure is enough for semitendinosus graft harvesting. Graft amputation or pre-mature harvesting always concern for surgeons. Tendon strippers must apply gently and carefully to the tendon direction appropriate to mitigate against this. Iatrogenic saphenous nerve injury is a risk and has been previously described in the literature8 20 40 % of cases. Careful superficially dissection to identify saphenous nerve and appropriate protection during deep dissection would minimize risk9.
In conclusion, Alternative landmark 1 finger breadth below the tibial tuberosity and ¼ the width of the medial metaphysic at this level lateral to the medial tibial crest is a good incision landmark for harvesting semitendinosus tendon and tunneling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the same incision.
References
1. Kodkani PS, Govekar DP, Patankar HS. A new technique of graft harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadruple semitendinosus tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 2004;20:e101-4.
2. Prodomos CC, Han YS, Keller BL, Bolyard RJ. Posterior mini-incision technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft harvest. Arthroscopy 2005;21:130-7.
3. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, et al. Patellat tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstruction the anterior cruciate ligament: A meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:2470-8.
4. William RJ III, Heyman J, Petrigliano F, Rozental T, Wickiewicz TL. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a four-strand hamstring tendon autograft. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87 (suppl 1, pt 1):51-66 (published erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:1826).
5. Taylor DC, DeBerardino TM, Nelson BJ, Duffey M, Tenuta J, Stoneman PD, et al. Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial using similar femoral and tibial fixation methods. Am J Sports Med 2009;37:1946-57.
6. Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y, Xia C, Zhang C, Yu T, et al. Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with at least 2.5 years follow-up compareing hamstring tendon autograft and irradiated allograft. Arthroscopy 2011;27:1195-202.
7. Pallis M, Svodoba SJ, Cameron KL, Owens BD. Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States Military Academy. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:1242-6.
8. Shelton WR, Fegan BC, Autografts commonly used in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2011;19:259-64.
9. Sanders B, Rolf R, McClelland W, Xerogeaners J. Prevalence of saphenous nerve injury after autogenous hamstring harvest: An anatomical and clinical study of sartorial branch injury. Arthroscopy 2007;23:956-63.